MONOMYTH / SPECIES REFERENCES

Pokemon Monomyth Duskull: two images, one numbered entry

Pokemon Monomyth Duskull has two collected reference sprites under No176, and both are recorded as Ghost. Their outlines and details differ, so this page compares the actual images rather than inventing an official form name. A viewer said a launch-day video missed a form; that comment is attributed, not an independently verified video omission.

Updated

Pokemon Monomyth Duskull: two reference sprites

Both images belong to the same No176 Duskull record in the official v1.0 patch reference. They share Ghost typing. Their display order and alternate-reference label organise this page; they do not identify a shiny, sex, evolution stage or way to obtain the image.

Names, numbers and types

NumberNameTypesImage reference
No176[1]Duskull[1]Ghost[1]Reference A
No176[1]Duskull[1]Ghost[1]Reference B

Reference labels distinguish the pictures; they are not official form names or evolution instructions.

Field evidence

  1. Team Monomyth ↗ · v1.0

How do I recognise Duskull in Pokemon Monomyth?

Look at the full outline before comparing a single colour. The compact reference spreads across a grey, irregular silhouette around the pale face. The other reference has a more upright arrangement, a rounded grey upper part and visible pink edging beside and below the face.

These differences give you specific places to check in a screenshot: the upper outline, the space around the face and the lower edge. They are descriptions of the pictured references, not names for body parts, a gender classification or a claim about how an animation changes.

If the image on your screen resembles one of these references, match its name and No176 label as well. A similar-looking ghost elsewhere in a video is not enough to identify it as Duskull.

  • Compare the entire silhouette, including the upper and lower edges.
  • Check the pink edging and the arrangement around the face.
  • Confirm the displayed name and number rather than relying on colour alone.

Do the two images have different types or numbers?

No difference is recorded in these fields: both references are Duskull, No176 and Ghost. The comparison therefore answers an image-identification question without creating another numbered species.

Two sprites under one entry are not two extra Pokedex numbers. Nor does an alternate-reference label tell you whether the game treats a difference as a selectable form, a state, a special encounter or something else. Those would require their own evidence.

This distinction matters when comparing lists. One list may show a single representative picture for a name while another reference presents multiple images under that same name. Picture counts and numbered-entry counts measure different things. That observation alone does not establish what any particular video did.

Why did a viewer mention a missing Duskull form?

In our October 31 snapshot of comments on Null and Void's Pokedex video, one viewer said a Duskull form was missing. The linked comment is the source of that statement. It is one person's observation about one upload, not an official correction or a survey of players.

We have not completed a frame-by-frame check that establishes the video's actual omission. What we can show independently is narrower and concrete: the current v1.0 reference contains the two Duskull sprites displayed here.

The useful answer is therefore the side-by-side reference, with its sources. It lets you inspect the images for yourself without turning the comment into a confirmed account of the video or assuming that every other Pokedex showcase has the same coverage.

Does a different colour mean a shiny or an evolution?

The Pokemon Monomyth Duskull images here use their decoded normal-reference palettes. That describes the source of these reference pictures; it is not a reading of your own Pokemon's shiny flag, sex or other internal state.

A colour sample from a screenshot cannot supply those missing facts. Lighting, resizing, compression and browser colour handling can also affect what a local pixel tool reads. If you use the coat lab, treat its RGB/HEX values as notes about your image, not a rarity or form certificate.

An evolution claim needs a different kind of evidence: the starting entry, the action and the resulting screen. A different silhouette in a reference gallery cannot substitute for that sequence. We do not assign either pictured Duskull an evolution requirement.

How should I compare my own Duskull screenshot?

A useful screenshot preserves field labels as well as the creature. Work from a copy, so cropping or enlarging the sprite does not remove your only record of that context.

The full Pokedex is the next stop for the surrounding collection and field sources. This page stays with Duskull's two reference images; it does not provide a catch location, a battle ranking or a confirmed unlock procedure.

  • 1. Keep the name, No176 and Ghost label in the first screenshot if your screen shows them. Retain visible version information too. This records what the game actually displayed before you compare the picture.
  • 2. At a readable scale, compare the whole silhouette with each reference: upper outline, face arrangement and lower edging. If you enlarge a crop, keep the labelled original beside it so the crop retains its context.
  • 3. Note the match in separate parts: name and number, outline and any colour difference. A partial match can remain unresolved; it does not need an official-sounding form name, shiny label or guessed evolution requirement.

Pokemon Monomyth Duskull FAQ

How many Pokemon Monomyth Duskull reference sprites are recorded?

Two reference sprites are collected under No176. Both carry the name Duskull and Ghost typing; two pictures do not add another numbered entry.

Is the second Duskull reference a different type?

Not in the verified fields used here. Both references are recorded as Ghost.

Is the alternate-reference label an official form name?

No. It is an editorial way to distinguish the collected images. The evidence here does not supply a separate official name or a way to obtain it.

Is one of these images a confirmed shiny Duskull?

No shiny status is established by this comparison. These are normal-palette reference sprites, and a screenshot's colour alone cannot identify an internal shiny flag.

Did the video definitely leave out a Duskull form?

A viewer made that claim in the linked comment. We have not established the omission through a complete frame-by-frame check, so the claim remains attributed to that viewer.

Sources

Continue exploring